Live Webinar

The Data Foundation Driving Effective AI Agents in AML

AI agents are only as good as the data they run on — yet most discussions about AI in AML skip past the data layer entirely. In this session, compliance practitioners and AI implementation experts examine the foundational data requirements that determine whether agentic AI delivers on its promise.

  • How data accuracy, completeness, and structure determine what agentic AI can and cannot do in AML workflows

  • Where data gaps silently degrade alert quality and risk decisioning

  • How AI agents consume and interpret data context at the point of decision

  • How to assess data readiness across customer records, transaction history, and third-party feeds

Meet the Speakers

Justin is an experience AML expert with experience overseeing sanctions and money laundering programs at regulated financial institutions. He also assists in AML oversight for FinWise Bank’s fintech partner network.

Jesse Reiss

CTO

Hummingbird

Jesse is CTO and co-founder of Hummingbird, an AML and financial crime compliance platform, where he oversees development of AI-enabled products to accelerate investigations.

Peter Piatetsky

CEO and Co-Founder

Castellum.AI

Peter leads strategy, growth and product at Castellum.AI, working closely with clients to implement risk-aligned solutions. Prior to co-founding Castellum.AI, Peter served at the US Treasury Department.

Justin Masterman

BSA Officer

FinWise Bank

Featured Resource

How to Evaluate AI Agents for AML/KYC Workflows

A practical guide for teams to assess, test and implement AI agents into compliance workflows. What’s inside the guide:

  • True agentic AI vs. automation: How to spot real autonomy, not just workflow orchestration.

  • Data governance: Why ownership and control of risk data matters for safe decisioning and auditability.

  • Human-in-the-loop design: How to ensure the right feedback loop to improve accuracy and accountability.

  • Regulatory readiness: How to align AI deployment with emerging regulatory expectations.